Background and Purpose. Data on performance times for the 'timed up and go' (TUG) test with analyses of factors, that eventually could affect the result in patients with hip fracture, have not been published to date. The aims of the present study, therefore, were to assess normative reference values of TUG performances and determine the influence of individual and clinical factors on TUG-test scores in patients with hip fracture. Method. In this prospective, descriptive study, a total of 196 consecutive patients over the age of 60, and able to perform the TUG when discharged directly to their own homes from a specialized orthopaedic hip fracture unit, were evaluated. The association between TUG scores and categorical variables were examined, and linear regression was used to investigate the factors influencing performance times. Results. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between all categorical variables, except gender, but multivariate linear regression analyses showed that only a high pre-fracture function level, evaluated by the New Mobility Score (B = -11), was independently associated with having a good TUG score, while older age (B = 0.49), having an intertrochanteric fracture (B = 7), performing TUG with a walker (B = 15), and performing TUG in the later postoperative period (B = 0.39) were independently associated with having a poorer TUG score. Conclusions. These preliminary normative reference values of TUG performances in patients with hip fracture can be used as references, to which individuals can expect to perform. Multivariate testing suggests that clinicians should use age, pre-fracture function, fracture type and walking-aid specific data when interpreting the TUG test results. Physiotherapists should be aware of this if TUG scores are to be used predictively or as an outcome measure in patients with hip fracture, especially in research. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Source: Physiotherapy Research International)
Article/News Source:
Physiotherapy Research International
Factors with independent influence on the ‘timed up and go’ test in patients with hip fracture
Published in July 23rd, 2008
Posted by Physiotherapy Research International in Physiotherapy
No user responded in " Factors with independent influence on the ‘timed up and go’ test in patients with hip fracture "
Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback urlSocial Network
Translators
Recent Entries
- Subject Index.
- Author Index.
- Emerging Technologies and Fourth Generation Issues in Cartilage Repair.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage Repair.
- Cartilage Repair: Third-Generation Cell-based Technologies-Basic Science, Surgical Techniques, Clinical Outcomes.
- Second Generation Issues in Cartilage Repair.
- Minced Articular Cartilage-Basic Science, Surgical Technique, and Clinical Application.
- Cartilage Repair: Synthetics and Scaffolds: Basic Science, Surgical Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes.
- FDA Regulatory Pathways for Knee Cartilage Repair Products.
- Overview of Existing Cartilage Repair Technology.
Categories
-
- Arthroscopy (42)
- Chiropractic (20)
- Ergonomics (213)
- Manipulative Therapy (10)
- Manual Therapy (233)
- Massage Therapy (27)
- Musculoskeletal Disorders (70)
- Orthopaedics (431)
- Pediatric Physical Therapy (51)
- Physical Medicine (192)
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (77)
- Physical Therapists (229)
- Physiotherapy (125)
- Products (108)
- Rehabilitation (317)
- Sports and Exercise (546)
- Sports Medicine (588)
- Uncategorized (333)
Archives
-
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006